A few notes on Greek Monistic Metaphysics and Physics

Read the following sources in this order before you proceed:

Pythagoras, Plato, and the Golden Ratio:
https://archive.org/download/PythagorasPlatoAndTheGoldenRatio/PythagoreanGoldenRatio.pdf
The Indefinite Dyad in Plotinus’ Metaphysics & Mysticism: Uncovering the Meaning of the Attribute of the One in Greek & Indian Monism:
https://archive.org/download/IndefiniteDyadPlotinusMetaphysicsMysticism/IndefiniteDyadPlotinusMetaphysicsMysticism.pdf
Uncovering the missing Secrets of Magnetism:
https://archive.org/download/magnetism1small/magnetism1small.pdf

Now stare at this image:

I have tried to jam pack various concepts into one image which is why it may not make much sense at first glance even with context. Some concepts are implicit and isn’t made explicit. Yes I have “hidden doctrines” but so did Plato and Ken Wheeler though I assume he will clarify some of them in his upcoming fourth edition of his magnetism book but he did make many videos on this which isn’t present in the third edition so I do recommend watching a playlist like the following for more context: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5kyPmMBGWIqWsl9lRig0yj_G5EZezCnd

An important observation or epiphany I had when studying what Ken was trying to explain was that he’s been trying to convey “substance monism” to explain that all the modalities of the aether is the aether divided against itself while the aether itself is the projected image of the Absolute, and that the aether is the psyche but the aether is the divine attribute of the One as the Citta/Nous/Magnitude/Rhea/Xaos/Psyche tou pantos, etc. The primordial agnosis/avijja of the One is what gives rise to Totality/Pan and excessivus, “6” yet it is hyperlogically divinely necessitated extrinsic attribute of the One. The liberated Nous/Cittavimutti that knows itself as the One is the aether/soul that had used apophasis/neti-neti to unknow that which is “na me so atta”/not the self or anatta/anatman which is the psycho-physical aggregate that has a name and a (physical) form or namarupa or psyche-soma that identifies itself as the mimesis-hyle/shape of matter but neither shape nor matter together becomes its own principle, it’s merely the byproducts of the attribute of the aether/soul which the principle and attribute of the aether that is emanated and returns back to the One from metaphysical nescience generated through seeking self in not the self since the One is not Intellect/Nous which is inseparable from the Eidos, and Eidos and aether together is One in principle, but the aether grasping onto mimesis-hyle is the One in attribute to be within the physical cosmos and experience the illusion of otherness.

Since the Monad is perfect, it simply cannot know that which is not perfect, so it seeking to be what it already is in ignorance becomes the source of its own suffering, yet one must keep in mind that there is always at least one attribute for every principle, at least one principle for every attribute. There is only one Infinite, the Unlimit, Nous, and there is the infinite One. Both aren’t principles, plural, rather, the infinite One and the one Infinite is one, is the Aoristos Dyad, coeternal inseparable relationship/proportion of the One divided against itself asymmetrically where it can be repeated again indefinitely in every divided section whereby the sections with the same length is exponentially doubled indefinitely every single time when asymmetrically divided in all sections at once and dividing those divided sections too, which this incommensurate proportionality evaded the likes of materialistic nominalistic physicalists that had no idea that base phi was used. I don’t think anyone has ever heard of this but I know how this is done and I can prove it but that’s another topic.

The destruction of matter is the destruction of the byproducts of the aether, does not destroy the aether at all, and so too is the cessation of light/aether perturbations doesn’t negate light in principle, rather, light in attribute as illumination is nullified. There’s no need to believe in infinitesimal infinite charge carrying particles, the turtles all the way down is illogical, while the poynting vectors occur within the one universal soul/aether in a state of perpetuated flux but that which is perpetuated isn’t eternal, it is merely perpetuated by the eternal principle. Though the physical world is spatio-temporally beginningless and endless of the uncaused cause of the coeternal divine principle Monad and attribute Nous, there is an asymmetry in Totality and without it, there wouldn’t be any Noetic, Eidetic symmetry to the gyromagnetic procession of Aesthetic emanation of the 1 in phi as 1 over phi, 1 to phi, 1/phi, mimetic-hylic byproducts of attributes of magnitude/magnetism and dielectric metaphysical inertia of the aether of which force and motion is magnetic, inertia and acceleration is dielectric, but magnetism is really the dielectric field discharge while dielectricity is the dielectric field charge that accelerates towards the rest in the unmoved mover that doesn’t move yet without it, nothing moves or perpetuated without it.

Dielectric acceleration is what is conventionally called magnetic attraction when all magnetic fields repulse away from each other as it is that which is occupied field space while its inverse unmanifests space which takes no force at all to have field pressures to mediate. Gravity is really therefore incoherent dielectric acceleration through inertial field pressure mediation into its lowest pressure gradient, seeks to be more amorphous rather than be orderly coherent and polarized uniformly at the microcosmic field level which what defines a magnet is obviously qualitative and never quantitative yet field coherency has multiplicative strength rather than additive strength as a conceptual 5 watt light-bulb isn’t as dangerous as a conceptual 5 watt laser for lasers are point source field geometry, of which magnetized subjects, since the dielectric field isn’t objective, are too another form of point source field geometry that comes from the non-cartesian unmanifest inertial principle of the aether itself is One yet at the microcosmic scale, all Protons/Hydrogen-1 are a perfect dipole at its simplest state with a Larmor frequency that is ideally identical to the angle of 1/2 as 42.492235… MHz/Tesla is close enough to 42.58 MHz/Tesla at least to Ken Wheeler has found the Platonic form of the field geometry of the Protium/Proton which all Neutrons after 17 or so minutes decay into Protons, while the electric field is a byproduct of the dual reciprocal inseparable emanation/magnetism and reversion/dielectricity of the aether bound to cartesian three dimensionality.

I can go on and on, but you really need to look into those sources with an nondualist mindset and I don’t want to repeat myself of what Ken had repeated over and over ad nauseum. Understanding the grand unified field theory as outlined by Greek, Indian, Egyptian Monists and through the giants of Electrical theory like Charles Proteus Steinmetz, James Clerk Maxwell, Oliver Heaviside, Nikola Tesla, Eric P. Dollard, and even some basic understanding of Topology will help one realize Henri Poincare’s model of projective geometry, is exactly how Magnetism is emanated ideologically without any real “movement” in the 3-sphere that people like Alexander Unzicker has promoted some sort of mathematical expression to explain and simplify nonlinearity of curvilinear emanations and come to realize that our vain tasks in linearizing nonlinear systems had trapped us in seeing the world as an unreal tangent space that doesn’t at first appears to obey basic rules of a naive objective sense based interpretation of the world through abstractions of measurements of attributes of principles as principles which is a reification fallacy.

Addendum: I should clarify that the dielectric/reciprocated magnetism represented in blue in some diagrams online only conveys the “strength” of the “pull” and does not represent the actual “field” of the hyperboloidal dielectric that it takes place within. And before someone points it out, strength and pull isn’t in terms of force and motion but inertia and acceleration. The flatter the “magnet” polarized at the short end and not halfway at the long end in its shape like say a disk or ring magnet, the stronger/wider its gyromagnetic precession, the stronger the dielectric acceleration, the weaker the depth of the magnetic footprint, and the faster its depolarization compared to other magnets.

Next article: https://anankelogos.wordpress.com/you-are-not-what-you-know-believe-or-do/