Since time immemorial, there always have been a cultural, societal struggle between two general schools of thought: Realist and Nominalists. The Realists in Egyptian, Indian, and Greek cultures uphold metaphysical monism, a non dualist approach to the apparent dualism that arises from ignorance to not be able to know and come to understand the fundamental substrate behind the illusions of corporeal being and material becoming are two sides of the same underlying systems that which cannot be escaped by merely picking one/creationism or the other/materialism or both/pluralism or neither/annihilationism as real in and of itself, rather, there is a transcendent explanation to the emanation of the transcendent subject into its lesser modalities. The Nominalists mistaken the Realists for Creationism or a mere abstraction of Creationism through what’s not real and pigeonhole Realism by their own failure to assimilate the transcendent truth for themselves by making abstracted exceptions to their own rules that they’ve misinterpreted from and build upon their own abstractions of reality as if it was reality to justify their unreality of anything that they don’t like. In reality, creationism, materialism, pluralism, annihilationism, all four are ultimately Nominalism, are the metaphysically profane and duped, even the translators of Egyptian, Indian, and Greek metaphysical monistic texts tend to misinterpret those texts because they lack the golden clavis of understanding to unlock the abductive, retroductive method utilized by the Realists to turn away from agnosis itself through the unknowing of all falsehoods.
One of these translators had made a grave error in positing that there is one and there is many as two principles is the greatest error of metaphysical nescience that plagues all bean counting nominalistic mathematicians that had dishonestly substituted limit and unlimit as finite and infinite and then substituted finite as countable and infinite as uncountable, using materialistic deconstructivism to deny the infinite because it is uncountable, failing to grasp what was the limit and the unlimit in Greek metaphysics, had also deified finite essences to be all that is real and knowable, and infinite essences to be all that is unreal and unknowable, so therefore they foolishly conclude that they live in a finite cosmos made out of finite matter that lasts infinitely, or is comprised of something smaller than traditional matter that lasts infinitely, or is comprised of infinitely infinitesimal scales of matter that lasts infinitely to compensate the hypocritical flaws that bean counting has.
These people don’t grasp that the limit/peras and the unlimit/aperion are not even fundamentally numbers to begin with, both are expressions of the extrinsic attribute of the Monad. The Monad is also isn’t a number. It is the Absolute principle, it cannot be quantified or expressed or externalized directly. The limit and unlimit are fundamentally unified as different modalities of the same essence of the Nous in either agnosis or gnosis, both modalities are fundamentally necessitated due to the Monad of which the Nous in principle is the first divine attribute of the Monad as what the Monad does in attribution can only be known as the Nous in emanation/proodos into lesser/weaker realms of manifestation or the Nous in reversion/epistrophe not merely as or like or be or becoming the Monad but knowing the Monad is the Self, while all realities both metaphysical and physical are seeing modalities of the Self as the true Self is in effect, the means of emanating the Self outside of the Self in principle as the Self in attribution and objectively identifying the Self as the object becomes into manifest corporeal being and perpetual becomings of being for as long as the projection of what the Nous sees itself as in and through agnosis of its own modalities of the projected Nous which is the Psyche/”soul” into or as the world is the psyche tou pantos or the World Soul which is essentially the Aether which is absolutely not to be conflated by Aristotelian Aether which many of these mathematicians do so ever foolishly and never grasp the reality that the Aether is fundamentally immaterial as elucidated upon by some Neoplatonists which mind you, even Sri Sankaracharya had understood that the Aether is immaterial since all Metaphysical Monistic systems are the same in essence so quoting Aristotle without understanding how the Platonists understood the Platonic form (not merely “solid”) of the Dodecahedron is quite pedestrian to say the least.
The wisdom of what the Monad is, isn’t objectively comparable to anything at all. The Monad is not Intellect, it doesn’t know nor can it know, that is the primordial attribute of the Monad is agnosis which cannot know of anything that is separate from itself, seeks a self in that which is outside of its knowing which is absolutely impossible and metaphysically illogical since you cannot ever truly know of that which is other than the divine principle without knowing it as an attribute of the divine principle. The foundation of all realities hinges upon the Monad, and you cannot truly even know of knowing that which you don’t know, you can only know that you don’t know, which is agnosis, but it is also the beginning of the search of the truth, not “the fear of the Lord”, not “academia”, not whatever traditional cultural context you were raised in. To even accept that there is something that we cannot know is to know that you don’t know. All that is “real” is that which can be known, yet you can never project that into what is apparently real as in the impermanent modalities of the permanent aether as matter and “light”/illumination are both attributes of the one light/aether in principle.
What is the soul as what people conventionally refer to the soul to be is really not the soul, rather, the expression of the soul in the modality of the soul as if it was the permanent self yet is really the impermanent false self bound to perpetual change and becoming, as matter is recycled by living beings and as the soul in agnosis seeks out a new vessel to identify selfness with. Physical matter reincarnates but metaphysical soul transmigrates after death seeking mortal living being and becoming of being. That ignorant soul is consciousness, it is a verb, someone is in the state of consciousness, it seeks to identify itself as that which isn’t. Consciousness is the Intellect in Ignorance, but consciousness dies with the body because it only exists as a corporeal amalgamate of soul and body, psycho-soma, of which the body is an impermanent combination of shape/mimesis and matter/hyle, combined is “shadow matter”, animated by the soul as if it was real, the soul in its ignorance identifies itself as the false self that is the product of its own becoming of ignorance generated through the Forms in emanation as amalgamated byproducts of attribution as shape of matter, projects the false soul that only sees the shadows and not even the illumination that gives the false shape to the shadows.
The disembodied soul/Nous still retains its ignorance, becomes a soul-body aggregate yet again. Consciousness is like the light that is illuminating matter is not light in principle but light in attribution as illumination. Without illumination, there is no matter to even see, but trying to “see” the light in principle cannot be done since the principle of light is not its attribution of light as illumination, so to “illuminate” upon what is light, one must not think of it as illumination nor the shadows that illumination creates through the form of the matter, nor is it the fire that is used within the cave of ignorance for the puppet masters to use its illumination to project the shadow puppets onto the wall of becoming. To escape the false light of its own making, one must first disobjectify from that which is not the Self before the synthesis of that which is the Knowledge of the Self and the Knower of the Knowledge to be beyond both, only knows that thou art, not in becoming something other than who you are, not as if it’s separate from you to somehow mystically becoming other than you, neither is this knowing existential knowing of trivial factoids retained by your existential memory banks on your fleshy, fatty neural network hardware and software called the brain.
All lies retain a hidden truth to hide the truth from you, just as all misapprehensions to build upon what is true even if it’s not fully true because it’s foundations aren’t true despite how honest and earnest one is in deeply thinking it is true and not even lying to others that they think it is true, some aspects are based upon something that is true but is also a failure to come dig beneath the superficial surface to come to the root of the understanding because they aren’t thinking clearly. Physical forms/rupa, feelings/vedana, perceptions/sanna, experiences/sankhara, consciousness/vinnana, are not the Self/”na me so atta”. Metaphysical recollection/anamnesis to the Platonic Forms isn’t to those aggregates of corporeal existence that the soul identifies with, it is apophatically negated (via negatonis, neti-neti) through Platonic Retroduction which is neither the Inductive nor Deductive method yet has elements of both but the resultant effect of what is reduced is that which is not the attributes of something, rather, the principle behind the attributes that are pulled away until there is nothing left to remove without denying the very essence of that something to begin with, and to come to know of that purified essence itself isn’t through the affirmation of the objective repeatable tests to be repeatable, for that is objectively irrelevant to the subjective essence of what the truth behind the observations is about.
Now, whenever people try to approach the One, they come to know of the One in Many, the Many in One, and the amalgamation of both, yet can’t really know of the One without knowing the expression of the One and also understanding that the emanation of the One doesn’t negate the One in principle, without the One, there’s no Many to be generated from. Likewise, the Nous is coeternally inseparable and incommensurate from the One for there is always an attribute to any principle while if a principle has no attributes, it is not a real principle but an attribute of a principle. There is of course a metaphysical “limit” to the unlimit emanation, which at a certain point it’s just nothing, but there’s no knowing of nothingness since there’s always a subject witnessing a lack of essence from what they observe yet they are in that nothing so it’s not nothing, there is no nothing, which the reification of attributional byproducts of magnitude combined into its own false entity as space-time is ultimately one of the five aggregates to corporeal existence that isn’t real in and of itself as in principally real, only apparently real because there’s a truer principle behind the abstracted attributions which are not even real attributes from real principles, which attribute reification of what’s not even a principle as a principle is nothing short of thinking there’s little men behind the television screen.
These mathematicians can’t even look at Plato’s divided line without misinterpreting what it’s saying. They misinterpret the very idea behind it and so don’t even grasp what Plato’s cave allegory is about because it’s all intertwined, you cannot know Plato’s cave allegory without knowing how to divide the line to begin with in its essence and not being a legalistic moron that ignores the underlying proportionality to make the divided line segment to be proportionally valid, which is something that people who are stuck in base 10 or any base numerical system can’t think outside of a finite limited measuring scheme, can’t think in terms beyond numerology, can’t even grasp basic geometry since they cannot ever fathom nor accept that all geometric lines are conceptual and not physical at all, drawn lines are merely physical representation of that which is nonphysical, immaterial, so the notion of arbitrarily dividing a line and dividing those segments into the same proportions as the first division is inconceivable and impossible indefinitely just because it can’t be done physically. They have never ever constructed proportionate triangles using Thales theorem before and that’s in part due to the failure of modern academia. These people are always thinking numerically and measuring in limited measuring systems that only measure limits. These systems are limited by their own illogically self imposed limitations, nature fundamentally uses no numbers to measure what is immeasurable yet asserts that nature is finite and countable because atoms exists yet they cannot even count the numbers of atoms that empirically exists using their own two hands without resulting to approximations and algorithms that are empirically unproven. No one has nor will be able to objectively verify how many atoms are in the physical cosmos, period, it’s objectively unknowable, uncountable, ergo, it’s infinite or “extensively indefinite”, you can never define definitively how many atoms are there in the physical cosmos, it is The Unlimit; beginningless, endless.
There is no objectively knowable, verifiable beginning to the universe without knowing the all/many are one, ergo, there’s only one unlimit, only one universe, but that isn’t to say that there are by any means a countable number of atoms in the universe because all that is real is finite according to these imbeciles. No one can nor could ever be able to count what is indefinite, even if you insist that what is indefinite is “finite”, you cannot know that it is “finite” to begin with because you only have a limited perspective within the space of the earth and the time that you’re alive. You cannot assert that the universe is “finite” if you deny “infinite” while if you substitute finite as countable yet you cannot use approximations of what is countable since that’s still cheating and unverifiable. All approximations of how much matter there is in the universe is only really about the locally observable universe, and to assume that observable universe is the whole universe is also wrong. All estimation of the supposed age of the universe when matter is perpetually created and destroyed by black holes is a fool’s errand. The real answer to the age of that which has no objective age but is also physical is perpetuated eternity.
What is perpetuated eternity? It is by mere attribute, “everlasting” because of a greater principle that is truly eternal in principle because it is beyond the measuring of the magnitude which gives the attributes of both spatial and temporal systems, though time is only experienced because there is impermanence in reality that goes through the process of decay, which in the minds of these fools cannot ever conceive of the answer to this even if they don’t posit a beginning to the universe, they do still hold on to the notion of an inevitable end to the universe without ever being witness to that end which will not come. There is no past nor future to the divine, all is “now” but we only, by vain grasping onto aggregate experiences perceive that there is a past and that there will be a future. Of course this isn’t the denial of the experience of time itself, rather, the denial of that perpetuated time expressed through space from different objective reference points that’s bound to decay since matter itself is impermanent and ultimately destructible by any means being “real” in and of itself, for time is merely the measuring of material and immaterial processes using some objective reference point which again, objects aren’t truly eternal, while life itself is even more unstable and ephemeral of an existence than the matter it is objectively comprised of, so the grasping onto materiality as if it was eternal is in part what perpetuates the suffering of the soul.
If you destroy matter, what is left? Light as illumination. There are no charge carrying particles so there is no “electron” while so called photons are ultimately transverse waves, waves of the aether itself, usually as high energy gamma rays. The modality of the aether merely shifts into another modality of the aether, both waves and particles are phenomenal modalities of the aether. There are fools that look at electromagnetic field vectors and claim there’s an electron-positron pair when for one, the only fundamental matter is the proton, and two, electrons aren’t particles, so there’s no “pair” of non-classical “quantum particles”, there’s merely an aether torsion field pressure mediation towards homeostasis. There can never be a truly objectively quantifiable verification of light as matter even if one supposes that electrons are physical when they’re not because they’re ultimately just observations of either electrostatic/dielectric discharges measured in electro volts falsely named as electron volts while electricity is a byproduct of the magnetic field moving against the dielectric field at a certain frequency or in other words: aether torsion. How can that which is supposedly smaller than matter affect matter as if it was matter? It can’t, it would require far too many “smaller” particles to affect the larger classical matter and it therefore won’t ever be a one to one representation of matter verses electron while the very means to detect it uses a flawed medium of silver halide crystal grains of various sizes that individually gets affected by a wide range of frequencies yet again, it takes a considerable amount of dielectric discharge bombardment from light frequencies to have one grainy part of the film to be “exposed” and become a tiny speck of illuminated film among many, you cannot use such means to by any means claim that light is a particle. These are the same idiots that claim that two photons after filtering out billions upon billions of photons prove the existence of the Higgs Boson. Similarly, the Muon Neutrino was “discovered” by cherry-picking from of hundreds of trillions of events only 29 events that the Muon Neutrino was the most likely interpretation of the observed events, ultimately these people only see what they want to see and never question their own asinine axioms that necessitate in their ignorance that it all has to be some form of physical particle, yet no metaphysically hyperlogical questioning ever goes on in the minds of these fools. They never question why the very premise of what they’re searching for is fundamentally flawed.
Matter cannot be a “standing wave”, nor can “standing wave centers” be a particle. Matter therefore isn’t a “standing wave” because ultimately it’s a particle in essence, negating the notion that matter is by any means a standing wave. Matter and particle cannot be flexibly interchanged without asserting that nonexistent subatomic particles to be matter in denotation, while the means of concluding the very existence of subatomic particles is obtained through severely flawed science whose practitioners see things as they wish to see them by ignoring anything and everything that speaks against their nonexistent methodology via brute force ignorance, is ultimately reified compounded ignorance as the truth, which the access to the raw data is not allowed by the general populace, so all in all no one will find the answers to the problems facing physics through traditional means of going through a college or university education and working in the field because most everyone around you is lying to you that they know that they do know yet cannot remain hyperlogically consistent at all levels.
Since the universe by metaphysical reduction is beginningless and endless attributionally due to the Monad being truly “eternal” makes the Nous in agnosis/Rhea/”Magnitude” coeternal by virtue of the divine principle has to have at least one attribute which is also known as the Aoristos Dyad or the Nous in gnosis that knows of itself as the Monad is liberated from its attributional ignorance of not knowing anything else that is not the Self because it knows that all is the Self in lesser emanations of the Self in principle as the Self in attribution that doesn’t know itself as the Self in principle. Since the universe always existed and always will exist, the universe cannot be expanding at all because it is everything, expansion is merely an illusion of the fact that the longer Earth exists or any arbitrary point within the infinite physical cosmos is used as a reference point, the more light from existing stars reaches earth, but assuming one can be on a point in space outlasting the lifespans of the galaxies themselves and using a near perfect telescope to observe the stars and galaxies that are almost as innumerable as the stars themselves to the point of not knowing if it’s a star or a galaxy since you don’t have an ideal perfect telescope (which cannot exist of course). All the far out stars only appears red shifted because they’re far away, not because the universe is expanding, but because there’s a limit to how light can propagate without being distorted and slowed down by nearby masses in the line of sight that contort the light before it reaches the observer, so of course going through various masses through space, not all light from all the stars would ever truly be visible at any point in the universe, there has to be some limit where you cannot see any light from beyond a certain distance, generally and conceptually speaking, due to the infinite masses that are in your way, there are infinitely more masses you don’t see and will never see.
I have two original theories based upon the nature of the universe. The first theory is that because magnets and all masses in general mutually accelerate towards a barycenteric counterspatial sink in between the two masses as seen in numerous ferrocell visualizations of the magnetic point source field emanation of the coherent dielectric field of the polarized subject since the objective mass comprising the object hasn’t changed in quantity, it is a qualitative change of the dielectric subject of the aether itself bound to coherent point, and knowing that there is magnetic fields bridging between galaxies due to the aether torsion generated by the galactic masses especially its super massive black holes, at a sufficient distance between two galactic masses of relatively high densities that are accelerated towards each other but both galaxies having enough inertia to resist that dielectric acceleration, the counterspatial sink at an multi-galactic level is generated between the two galaxies, creating a “black hole”. Yes I know they’re neither black nor that they are holes but I’m using black holes to conventionally communicate to you as to what we’re referring to.
The second theory is that since the universe is unlimit/aperion, and since galaxies tend to be clustered in tendril like formations, but is ultimately homogeneously distributed randomly at very huge distances approaching infinity (thereby debunking fractal symmetrical ordering at the universal, infinite scale), I propose that all galactic super massive black holes are merely the lowest pressure lines of the universe that at the supercluster scale are formed like the lines formed between bubbles that touch each other, the “bubbles” of the universe being the so called voids where there’s a lack of galaxies. I’d imagine that trying to go inside those voids is hard to do and is much easier to move between nearby galaxies. Some voids are large, some are small, but according to this theory they are high pressure zones that make the genesis of matter via super massive black holes harder than forming from nearby galaxies in my first theory due to how my first theory is more localized and by the hard fact that space ultimately has no properties in and of itself because space itself is a property of magnitude and magnetism, so ultimately I am claiming that super massive black holes therefore are themselves formed from the reciprocal limitless magnetic force of the universe against itself, “unmanifest” a counterspatial sink to mediate universal inertial homeostasis at a certain proportion that we might never truly know but can approximate and at the very least ponder about, but it’s still nevertheless always is a net of zero, for even matter itself gives rise to its existence from the point source emanation from the dielectric inertial point source which scales from matter to magnets to pulsars to black holes to super massive black holes. A very high dielectric field that overtakes the magnetic field of a mass through its inverse field reciprocation of its gyromagnetic precession, emits and generates mass and high energy gamma ray light since gamma rays at a certain threshold becomes compressed into a point where light merely goes through itself against itself as a simple torus generates a dielectric point source, is no longer bound to the process of the frequency or cycles of its own perturbation of compressions and rarefaction of light waves.
Conceptually, therefore, can it be applied to the universe? Are we living inside a toroidal universe? No we are not because that would imply a limit to the unlimited nature of the Nous in agnosis. You cannot escape a field “outside” a field without that outside being a location which therefore means there’s a field. There cannot be a location that’s not within the physical universe, for location is based on an objective reference point, for as long as there’s an object, the idea of the location also is apparently real as the object used to deduce the notion of location. Some of these bean counting goons even deny that, which is really pathetic to say the least.
While I’m at it, large masses like say, planets, seek to become slightly oblate spheroids, bulging at their sides due to rotation. Plasma is merely highly ionized gas particles by the high energy environment generated by high energy gamma rays which explains why galactic jets not only have plasma but also gamma rays. Plasma therefore is fundamentally just a different state of matter, not even a different modality of the aether. Light isn’t a rope nor is matter a bunch of ropes in a knot that somehow magically push and pull against itself and other rope knots and that analogy is very flawed and bound to the mental ideation of a physical rope that doesn’t function like a physical rope yet it uses terminology that implies it is physical when it cannot really explain how the illumination from the electrified filament of a lightbulb works when it’s in an airtight vacuum without somehow claiming that there’s invisible infinite ropes twisting the rope knot atoms comprising the glass to slow down when it’s twisting inside the glass yet speed back up when leaving the glass without violating the law of conservation of energy. All light bends around masses, it’s just that coherent masses i.e. black holes and magnets are generally more prominent in displaying that fact, though I don’t believe in so called Einstein rings, light nevertheless is affected by matter only if the light passes through the immediate magnetic field of the mass, which the plasma/ionized gas of the sun is what is causing the bending of light rays, around the sun, but there are images of visually distorted galaxies due to the magnetic field of other masses. Our sun is mostly comprised of metallic hydrogen but in its core is probably not hydrogen at all.
Everyone is speculating about various things, and even a broken clock is right twice a day, but only a few people are metaphysically consistent and somewhat know the futility of trying to know the objectively unknowable nature of objective paradoxes that cannot be objectively verified, it’s like a reverse broken clock; wrong twice a day, right every other time in the day, since ultimately no one is right about everything there is to know about physics and objective reality, but a very few people are right about metaphysics and even fewer know what is wrong about current physics and have also come to a better understanding of what is true physics guided by monistic metaphysics. Most of my corrected understanding is based on Kenneth Wheeler’s work but I don’t think he has explained why galaxies are clustered in tendril like formations, that’s my own thing, and it is somewhat falsifiable given that in order to test it you have to have a very powerful spaceship that could travel at extremely high velocities, exponentially beyond the maximum rate of induction (conventionally known as the speed of light) as well as equipment that can detect faster than light velocities. To travel fast enough to test the space turbulence but not so slow to not be able to notice any change of velocity while moving through various “voids”, is otherwise not falsifiable (but not unfalsifiable) assuming that no civilization on any life sustaining planet can ever achieve this. I encourage everyone to helping me help you understand what you don’t understand and vice versa and especially to those who recognize some of the sources I’ve used in this article since some of those people are right in some things which what they get right I’ve used in this article but are still Nominalists that have a muddied unclear mind due to the stupefying effects of material existence in general so they’re still ultimately wrong in other aspects briefly mentioned all over this article but alas, there’s no end to the collective ignorance of the people, neither the Realists nor the Nominalists will overcome the other for an eternity, but we are indeed in the intellectual dark ages manufactured by the Nominalists that persecute the Realists in many ways more than one all by their false axiomatic presuppositions.
Next article: https://anankelogos.wordpress.com/suppose/
Pythagorical 